A bitter High Court dispute has broken out concerning possible neighbours more than the development of the wall in a coastal web site in a very north Dublin suburb, a case that has attracted nationwide attention subsequent an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed loved ones household at Sutton Strand, where allegations of organizing breaches, environmental worries, and extensive-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Occasions write-up about René Collier along with the Irish Periods short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has advanced into a hugely publicised authorized battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than construction functions at the positioning on Dublin Road, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a corporation director respectively, request to make their relatives household. The case is now emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections plus the sensitivities of proven citizens. In accordance with the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall currently being made by their future neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted beneath preparing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, the two people of Dublin Street, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their organizing authorization by building a wall further than the boundaries of their web-site, leading to an encroachment over a Special Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as a result areas are matter to strict controls beneath European and Irish environmental regulation. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have lasting ecological outcomes, especially in the delicate coastal atmosphere for instance Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They're in breach of their arranging authorization, and say the wall, which is partially developed, is in the right situation. Their lawful workforce has characterised the motion being an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful improvement. The couple accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding so that you can maintain their view, an allegation that has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of numerous coastal setting up disputes, wherever sights of the sea are the two hugely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described remarkable efforts from the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by means of ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, In line with sworn evidence referenced in the Irish Times. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by way of waistline-large water during a storm to photograph the site Irish Situations, a picture that has since come to be emblematic with the intensity of your dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were meant to Collect Visible evidence with the wall’s placement relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Occasions claimed, describing how the two Adult men entered the water through serious climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm drinking water to photograph the site became one of the most hanging descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Occasions short article about accountant Paul Feely noted that these kinds of steps were cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into a region affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was staying encroached on.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been lined intimately because of the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 grew to become broadly searched phrases as audience sought to comprehend the history and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court listened to additional submissions on irrespective of whether interim orders needs to be granted to halt design pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential instant within the authorized timeline.
For the Main of the dispute can be a disagreement around boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep the wall, as manufactured, goes beyond what was authorized and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has long been called meticulous in his assessment of planning files, maps, and conditions attached to the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those pressured that their motion is determined by problem for environmental safety and adherence to organizing law. They reject promises that the case is about preserving a private view, insisting in its place that it is about making sure that advancement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they may have described their very long-standing connection to the world as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a few simply seeking to build a household home in accordance Using the legislation. They deny which the wall encroaches on a Particular Place of Conservation and say that every one operates are performed according to Specialist information and approved programs. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, like coming into The ocean all through a storm, do not alter the fundamental points.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how arranging disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute above building of wall at coastal web site has grown to be a shorthand description for just a situation that many observers see as increasingly common. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation in between private land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become much more contentious.
The Irish Times posting about René Collier observed that the businessman experienced Formerly been involved in area advocacy on setting up and environmental concerns, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Instances article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from really different Experienced backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, are becoming synonymous with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site through the sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through waistline-superior water for the duration of a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances and René Collier waded by waist-large drinking water all through a storm to photograph the site Irish Moments are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both the physical actuality in the coastline plus the symbolic mother nature of your act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive method.
Because the High Court proceedings proceed, the end result stays uncertain. The court must figure out whether the wall as built complies with planning authorization and irrespective of whether any encroachment right into a Specific Spot of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are complex, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and scheduling ailments. Still the human factor remains central: neighbours who must Are living along with each other extensive following the legal prices are paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over design performs at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, even so the implications of the case prolong beyond that tackle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the necessity of clarity in organizing permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. What's more, it underscores how rapidly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when fundamental troubles such as environmental safety and assets rights are perceived to get at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains a spot of pure elegance and contested boundaries. Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 The wall for the centre of the dispute stands partially created, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved lawful concerns. No matter if it will in the end be altered, taken off, or done as prepared will depend on the court’s findings. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will very likely continue on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to One of the more intently viewed scheduling disputes in north Dublin recently.